Stars and Sickles - An Alternative Cold War

The Goldsboro incident will definitely give a greater impetus to nuclear safety, which will carry along to the design and construction of nuclear power plants to make them safer. Like you said, as well, it's reasonable to assume that there will be an increased preoccupation with consumption and therefore more of a preference for organic foods. Personally I'm a GM supporter, so you could consider this a bad thing, but since it also makes nasty stuff less palatable, it will mean a populace that overall eats healthier. Fast food in particular is going to be a lot less... uhhh... unsavoury than IOTL. Conservationism definitely gets a lot more support after Goldsboro, since it reminds mid-20th century Americans something they had largely forgotten: that their wellbeing depends on the wellbeing of their environment around them. The Progressives of course are going to be really keen on this, but within the Republicans and Democrats environmental concerns seem to be based more on regional lines than anything else. Highly-urbanised states like New York will probably be less concerned with environmentalism than states that take more pride in their natural features. Rural areas will probably see themselves and be seen by others as bastions of "natural living". This of course creates some dilemmas for modernism. Does technology really solve all problems or does it create more too? I wouldn't go as far as saying that it will make Americans Luddites, but there may be a certain resurgence of romanticism about the American past, wood cabins and non-wasteful Indians and all that type of thing.

I agree with you about GMOs, and I would go a step further here. This might turn Americans off to irradiated food, which isn't even covered by the GMO controversy and has been going on since at least the 1930s. Okay, it's probably been going on too long to actually get the nation to stop irradiation, but I can see an analogous "labeling" war happening.:rolleyes:

But food chain awareness is probably a big win for the nation, as it's going to get the locavore movement going as much as 30 years earlier. A significant fraction of useless shortgrass in the country could be converted to vegetable gardens. It'll make regulating farms much more palatable in the national conscience (it'll probably kill the ethanol boondoggle). It'll probably make it easier to find legislative solutions to problems we're dealing with in the era of climate change, like the California drought. The mercury issue with fish will get more traction here. While breastfeeding vs formula is controversial even today, I'm guessing the NC situation will bankrupt more than a few formula companies.

Promoting conservation in rural areas is huge, as most of the environmentalism comes from urban elites IOTL. That's really going to change the nature of politics in the US. Based on how you phrase it, I would imagine housing and planning would be dramatically different in rural America. It could kill the rise of the exurbs, that's for sure, and even a lot of suburban development in the 1960s might be re-thought. This dovetails nicely with Percy's urban promotion, with a larger percentage of development occurring in relatively urban settings as more and more hurdles are thrown up to protect agricultural and wild lands.

Definitely less controversial than OTL. Americans don't mind a few pilots or army technicians going filibustering in exotic locale #617, as long as "their boys" aren't being drafted. If you ask most Americans in Stars & Sickles' universe where Laos and Vietnam were, they would have no clue.

The Hmong really got the short straw here. None are resettled in the United States, and they're essentially at the mercy of the Laotians and Vietnamese. Tragically, the outcome is likely to be an extended and unsuccessful low-intensity guerrilla campaign by the Hmong, who will be all but exterminated with no-one in the international community noticing or caring. Those that aren't killed are forced to carry identity cards that point out their ethnicity and what state has jurisdiction over them, but aren't given citizenship, passports etc. Basically it sucks to be among the Hmong. Unfortunately not everyone can be better off ITTL. *wishes there was a cry emoticon*



Shut up and eat your internet cookie. You've earned it :p Burma is the area I was talking about, although it's quite possible that there may be a degree of Indian interest in the country as well... Not to mention how complicated the ethnic situation there is...

A China-aligned Singapore would be interesting but I doubt it's likelihood. I haven't really decided what to do with Singapore to be honest, I'm thinking that the most likely outcome is for it to kinda be the Asian Switzerland it has been so far: happy to take everyone's money but otherwise not get involved. That's probably in the best interests of all the major powers' trade situation anyway.

Indonesia and the Philippines are also going to be areas where the Chinese seek to project power. Not that they will necessarily be successful doing so. ITTL, China in the 1960s is spinning a lot of plates at once, both at home and abroad, and frankly some of them are going to have to fall. Although their primary revolutionary strategy may change somewhat in the 1970s. Whether that is better or worse for the region is yet to be seen...
With no Korea or Taiwan, I do wonder if the "Asian Tiger" benefits will then shift to other countries in the region. Might we see a gleaming, First World Thailand, Indonesia, and/or Philippines? Or I guess it could all go to India, which would really be something as well...

I've got to agree with you there. As far as I'm concerned, there were a particular alignment of circumstances which allowed the anomaly of Jucheist North Korea to exist IOTL. These were:

1) Historical Korean "hermit kingdom" experience (counteracted by interaction with the USSR, China, and the wider Asia-Pacific region)

2) The constant presence of US and hostile South Korean forces on the Southern border (less intense with US and Japanese forces over a bit of sea, however narrow that sea is)

3) The Kim Dynasty (obviously done away with)

4) Underlying ideology of Korean supremacy, which arguably is a consequence of or predates Japanese colonisation (counteracted at least partially by greater attention to socialist internationalism)

Basically, whilst South Korea isn't the bustling uber-modern place it is IOTL, there is a lot less wealth disparity and there aren't the excesses of the DPRK we all know and don't love. Still there is going to be a degree of DPRK hard-headedness when it comes to the US and Japan. The Koreans haven't forgiven Japan for the colonial period, and the government is more than willing to give the false impression that the US is supporting their 'lackey'/'pig dog'/*insert derogatory Korean slang and/or communist jargon word here* in a plot to return Korea to the Japanese Empire. After all, in Korean eyes the Japanese can't have anything other than ulterior motives, which strangles Northeast Asian diplomatic normalisation in the crib.
And without Cuba, Korea is clearly going to be the place the Soviet Union banks on to humiliate the US at baseball in international competition.:p

The Korean chapter is supposed to be written in the present tense of Stars & Sickles 2015. And yes, the allusion/implication is that the communist 'bloc' as it's referred to survives, but describing the international situation of the S&S 21st Century isn't going to be as easy as "the communist bloc vs the free world" to say the least.
Hmm, that is interesting. And potentially worrying, if you believe that OTL has seen a drastic increase in personal freedom thanks to the rise of democracy and the fall of communism. Personally, I'm always rooting for freedom for the Baltic states.:eek:

Whilst you could say that East Asia hasn't been going well for the United States, you could say they haven't had that many big fights in the area either. Obviously you have the US inability to prevent the fall of the Nationalists in mainland China and then Taiwan (one big loss or a big one and a little one, depending how you're counting), Korea kinda slipping away whilst they were distracted, which doesn't concern them and their core interests, and Indochina, where a limp-dicked response by the US hasn't been able to contain determined North Vietnamese attempts to dominate former French Indochina. North Kalimantan was really more of a British/Commonwealth problem than American, and whilst the British lost North Kalimantan to a pro-Indonesian liberation movement, the British did suppress Chin Peng's guerrillas in Malaya, which is staunchly pro-Western. Thailand as well is the single most significant state in Indochina, which is a bulwark of anticommunism and very loyal to US interests (mainly because it gives them an opportunity to get a strong ally against the Vietname... I mean... against communism). Plus the periphery of the Asia Pacific region is allied with the US: Australia, NZ, Dutch New Guinea, Philippines. It could be worse for the Americans.

Also it shouldn't be forgotten that the US have allies in both Pakistan and India, so whilst they may not have a particularly powerful position in East Asia, South Asia is looking very promising. Whilst Dewey lost China, Jackson essentially won India. The US still has a pretty strong international position, with a decent relationship with Latin America and strong involvement with Europe, the "Outer Pacific" and South Asia.

Africa is an interesting one. By interfering in the Nigerian Civil War, the Americans ITTL have already got more directly involved in Africa than they ever have been IOTL. Furthermore, Africa is for both superpowers the "most distant battlefield". The premier Soviet ally on the continent, the Congo, is on an extremely long leash, and more than capable of telling the Russians where to shove it if they don't like Moscow's line. Meanwhile, the most steadfastly anticommunist countries in Africa are the Bight States, who're poised to become the Persian Gulf of Stars & Sickles, and the South Africa/Rhodesia-Nyasaland alliance, which the Americans have to be cautious about supporting as not to undermine their relationship with majority-rule states in Sub-Saharan Africa and touching a nerve with black voters at home. Africa presents something of a conundrum for both sides, especially with a greater number of significant local actors onstage. That's only going to increase in the 70s and 80s.

Well, my desire for the US not to prop up dictators was really just a wish, I don't think it's particularly realistic. But I think they're more likely to adhere to popular will ITTL than IOTL.

By the way Expat, thanks again for commenting. Always great to see feedback and engagement by readers, and you and xt828 not only give plenty of that but actually active assist me in improving this timeline. Once I complete this TL and hopefully turn it into an e-book, you two especially are going to get a special thanks. Much appreciated :eek:

A pleasure! You're producing a fascinating read, it's us who should be thanking you!
 
By the way Expat, thanks again for commenting. Always great to see feedback and engagement by readers, and you and xt828 not only give plenty of that but actually active assist me in improving this timeline. Once I complete this TL and hopefully turn it into an e-book, you two especially are going to get a special thanks. Much appreciated :eek:

[Zoidberg]Hooray, I'm helping [/Zoidberg]

Given the chronology, there might be some crossover between the tail end of public awareness of Lysenkoism and the first realisations of the effects of radioactive contamination on the food chain, which ought to have a solid impact on the scifi of the era. It'll probably be a huge aid to the nuclear disarmament movement worldwide, too - if American bomber crews can nuke their own country by accident, what might they do to ours. Conversely, it may also strengthen the position of "winnable" nuclear wars, as the damage is less than apocalyptic, and it may encourage efforts in the direction of the so-called nuclear battlefield. If LeMay is forced out and SAC onto the back foot, that may also reinvigorate the USN's ambitions towards the strategic deterrence role. It may also have a strategic effect in the USAF - if strategic bombing (which in this era largely means nuclear bombing) is taken away from piloted craft, then USAF may see bombing missions as largely tactical, as they don't have the examples of OTL's Linebacker and Linebacker II to show the utility of traditional WW2-esque area bombing.

Could we revisit India soonish? The last update that I can recall was a fairly short one in which there was a Saffron Revolution?

Also, you long ago pledged periodic culture and sport based updates.
 
Chapter 42: Deutschlandlied, Auferstanden aus Ruinen - The Two Germanies (1950-1970)
Deutschlandlied - Auferstanden aus Ruinen: The Two Germanies (1950-1970)

With the fall of the Nazi Third Reich and the division of Germany into occupation zones of the allied powers, the stage was set for the divergent development of the capitalist west of the country and the communist east. Whilst some in the American and Soviet foreign policy elites hoped for the reunification of a neutral Germany that would provide a buffer between the emerging blocs, the political reality on the ground disallowed such a course. In the west, the French, British and American occupation zones became the Federal Republic of Germany (Bundesrepublik/FRG) whilst the Soviet occupation zone became nominally sovereign as the German Democratic Republic (Volksrepublik, GDR). As is to be expected, the Bundesrepublik integrated itself with the transnational military and political environment of the 'Free World' whilst the Volksrepublik became a keystone of the Communist Bloc.

One of the first major Cold War confrontations was over the disputed status of Berlin, which had been divided into four occupation zones, each administered by one of the "Big Three Plus One" (USA, UK, USSR and France). As a precursor to the unification of the other allied occupation zones in Germany, the three Western powers coalesced their holdings into 'Trizonia', and announced that they would be establishing a new currency for Germany, the deutschmark, thus undermining Soviet manipulations of the reichsmark which was intended to keep the German people in poverty artificially. Concerned that West Berlin was becoming a conduit for German flight to the west, the Soviets established a blockade around West Berlin and buzzed air traffic into the city, beginning in March 1947. President Wallace defied the recommendations of the joint chiefs of staff to force open a corridor to the city, instead rationalising non-confrontation by pointing out West Berlin's vulnerability and the Soviet seizure of the city at the end of WWII, arguing that the cession of West Berlin to Russian control would be of greater value in generating goodwill with the USSR than it would be as part of the emerging Western security system. In reality, it emboldened the Soviets, who saw the Americans as pushovers, until this was checked by the hardline stance of Dewey and a myriad of other presidents since.

440566706.png

Contemporary cartoon from the aftermath of the Berlin Crisis

Whilst the leadership of Walter Ulbricht in the GDR was as abysmal as one would expect from attempts to ape the repression and forced Stakhanovism of the High Stalinist USSR, the destalinisation process which was initiated by Khrushchev's anti-Stalin clique gave rise to an alternative faction in the East German Volkskammer, led by Wilhelm Zaisser and Rudolf Herrnstadt. The first priority of this faction was ensuring the integrity of collective leadership, as despite Ulbricht's expulsion from power, there remained a number of potential autocrats amongst the Politburo, most notably Erich Mielke, who would head the state security apparatus, the Staatssicherheitdienst (SSD). The SSD would become an extremely effective security organisation, with international reach, high levels of professionalism and sophisticated technical ability, especially under the oversight of spymaster Markus Wolf. The Zaisser-Herrnstadt faction abolished the Central Committee Secretariat (previously occupied by Ulbricht) to end its erosion of Politburo authority, replacing it instead with a Presidium at the head of the Politburo, which would consist of two party chairmen and four other members. The post of General Secretary was replaced by the First Secretary, who would oversea the party organisation. Zaisser nominated Herrnstadt for this position by surprise, although he refused and Zaisser ended up in the position.

Zaisser's tenure saw a greater diversification of the East German economy and fostered a closer relationship between workers and the state-owned enterprises they served. With Ulbricht deposed, there was little appetite for Soviet-style collectivisation, which led the GDR to join the likes of Poland, Hungary and Yugoslavia as de-collectivised socialist states. Herrnstadt and Zaisser were both less concerned with mimicking Soviet-style communism than with creating a party which was optimal for the particular conditions present in the Volksrepublik. This included advocating a less repressive stance towards the intelligentsia and middle classes, with Herrnstadt raising a few Muscovite eyebrows with his comments that the GDR is not just a worker's state, it is "ein Staat für Arbeiter, Bürger und Wissenschaftler" ("one state for workers, bourgeois and scientists"). Herrnstadt also orchestrated a programme for consultation with factory employees, laying the foundation for innovative management techniques which resembled a less-extreme version of Yugoslav workers' self management, in line with Zaisser's preference for "humanistic socialism". They also kept a close eye on the development of the Soviet cybernetic economy to gauge its potential viability in the GDR.

53juni6_zaisser.jpg

First Secretary Wilhelm Zaisser

A less-savoury feature of the GDR was travel restrictions to which East Germans were restricted. The inner German border became increasingly militarised as the GDR sought to halt emigration to the FRG, whilst the FRG became increasingly concerned about the potential infiltration of spies and saboteurs. On 26 May 1952, the Volksrepublik implemented what it called a "special regime on the demarcation line" justifying the restrictive measures as necessary to "keep out spies, diversionists, terrorists and smugglers". A restricted zone (Sperrzone) five kilometres wide was created in which only those holding a special permit could live or work. Over 8,000 East German civilians living along the border were forcibly resettled in Aktion Ungeziefer ("Operation Vermin"). Another 3,000 preemptively fled to the west. Throughout the 1960s the GDR continued to tighten the border regime. From July 1962, the GDR declared the entire Baltic coast a border zone, with special powers for local security personnel in the area, whilst in the late 1960s the decision was made to upgrade border fortifications to establish a "modern frontier" that would be more difficult to cross. Barbed-wire fences were replaced with expanded metal barriers; directional anti-personnel mines and anti-vehicle ditches hindered movement; tripwires and electric signals helped detect potential escapees; all-weather patrol roads enabled rapid access to any point along the border; and wooden guard towers were replaced with prefabricated concrete towers and observation bunkers, usually equipped with light machine gun emplacements. In 1961 the border police, the Deutsche Grenzpolizei ("Grenzers") were integrated into the military command, becoming the Grenztruppen der DDR within the Nationale Volksarmee. On the other side of the border, the FRG was guarded by three separate entities: the Bundesgrenzschutz (Federal Border Protection Service); the Bayerische Grenzpolizei (Bavarian border police) and the Bundeszollverwaltung (Federal Customs Administration).

5603907389_6.jpg

Illustration of typical inner German border fortification

For its first fourteen years, the FRG was dominated by Konrad Adenauer and his Christian Democratic Union party (CDU). Dubbed "der Alte" ("the old man"), he was initially considered to be a caretaker chancellor, but turned out to be wilier and more instrumental than expected. Formed by his experiences as a youth during the aftermath of the 1870s Kulturkampf, Adenauer's social views were a manifestation of his lifelong hatred of "Prussianism". In his mind, National Socialism was a natural development of Prussian militarism and statism. He sought to build an alternative form of German conservatism, based around Christian (particularly Catholic) social teaching about the role of an individual within society and the importance of the state in respecting individual autonomy. He had constructed the CDU as a replacement for the Zentrum party, seeking to take it "out of the tower" by appealing to Protestants and German nationalists and create broad-based support.

konrad-adenauers-quotes-2.jpg

Konrad Adenauer being a little too open with voters

Adenauer stirred international controversy with his stance on denazification. He saw denazification as unnecessary and counterproductive to the goal of establishing a well-run German state. Many government bureaucrats had been members of the NSDAP for career purposes, and Adenauer recognised the importance of these people for the day-to-day operation of government. One of Adenauer's closest aides, Hans Globke, had drafted anti-Semitic laws during the Nazi era, leading to accusations from SPD parliamentarian Adolf Arndt that Globke "committed mass murder with paragraphs". Adenauer also oversaw Reinhard Gehlen's installation as head of the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND, Federal Intelligence Service), as well as campaigning for the release of the Spandau Six [131] securing the release of Baron Konstantin von Neurath and Reichsadmiral Karl Dönitz. In October 1950, Adenauer received the Himmerod Memorandum, drafted by four former Wehrmacht generals which linked freedom for German war criminals and public statements from the Allies that Germany didn't commit war crimes as "psychological preconditions" for the rearmament of Germany, a move which had been encouraged by British and American leaders. The leader of the Himmerod group was identified as General Hermann Foertsch, protege of the rabidly Nazi Generalfeldmarschall Walther von Reichenau, who had issued the notorious Severity Order explicitly demanding the annihilation of Jews on the Eastern Front of the Second World War. In 1951, Eisenhower, recognising the political necessity of such a move, made a declaration that war crimes committed reflected on the individuals involved, not the Wehrmacht as a whole. Whilst stopping short of absolving the Nazis for their sins, such statements assisted the GDR and Soviet Union in portraying the West as militarists, as well as creating the false impression in the Western public consciousness that war crimes were limited to the SS, ignoring the complicity of the Wehrmacht commanders in carrying out genocidal acts. These political stances gained Adenauer the support of the powerful and vocal interest group of German expellees from the east, the Heimatvertriebenen. Adenauer's nationalist policies in regards to rearmament, anticommunism and refusal to recognise the Oder-Neisse Line as Germany's legitimate borders appeased the Heimatvertriebenen who would otherwise have opposed his efforts to integrate into the West.

charta.jpg

Public meeting of Heimatvertriebenen in Stuttgart to protest the Oder-Neisse Line

One of Adenauer's more significant policies, but one of the most popular, was his decision to integrate the FRG into the European Coal and Steel Community. It was his view that Germany and France should form a common front against European communism and insulate themselves against potential backstabbing from the "Anglo-Saxons" of the UK and USA. Despite Adenauer's distrust of the English, he hoped that English involvement in a European Economic Community would allow their free market leanings to counter the dirigiste policies of the French. As it would turn out, political complications in the Anglo-French relationship arising from the 1961 putsch that installed the military junta in Paris would prevent the United Kingdom from being integrated into the continental system, as it came to be known, with the exception of NATO integration. Many ordinary Germans were suspicious of economic integration, viewing it as a French Trojan horse intended to extend the Occupation Statute. Adenauer's tenure saw economic development taking centre stage with the Wirtschaftwunder ("economic miracle") as the cornerstone of his Politik der Stärke ("policy of strength") that sought to entice East Germans to defect for a better quality of life in the Bundesrepublik. In fact, the social market policies pursued under Adenauer's government were not of his design, but of his Economic Minister Ludwig Erhard, who often clashed with Adenauer, particularly over whether to pursue a Europeanist or Atlanticist route. West Germany's economic revival caught the world, and the German public, by surprise. Real wages doubled between 1950 and 1963, with a 20% fall in working hours during the same period, and a fall in unemployment rates from 8% in 1950 to 0.4% in 1965.

In 1953, Adenauer's CDU won the federal elections in coalition with Franz Blucher's Freie Demokratische Partei (FDP). Under this term, German restitution laws, the Bundesentschädigungsgesetz, allowed some victims of Nazi persecution to claim restitution. In reality, very few who deserved restitution were compensated. For example, out of 42,000 applicants who had survived Buchenwald, only 700 were granted compensation. Furthermore, it explicitly excluded non-Germans and implicitly excluded communists, homosexuals, gypsies and family of victims. In 1955, in exchange for the release of the last German prisoners, the Bundesrepublik established diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union. The USSR was the exception to the Hallstein Doctrine, which held that the FRG wouldn't have diplomatic relations with states which recognised the GDR.

Adenauer vocally supported the British-French-Canaanite attack on Suez in 1956, and was outraged by US condemnation of the campaign. Adenauer came to the conclusion that the United States would continue to prioritise its own interests over that of Europe. Having decided that the United States is in essence a fair-weather friend, his determination to build a strong and lasting security relationship in Western Europe was reinforced. He suggested to colleagues in France and Italy that their countries should jointly develop and produce nuclear weapons and delivery systems, which started to eventuate in the mid-1960s. He was supported in these views by Franz Josef Strauss, the leader of the Bavarian-based Christian Social Union and the so-called "German Gaullist" faction in the Bundestag.

The CDU won the 1957 election easily and were further boosted by the reintegration of the Saarland into West Germany. In September 1958, de Gaulle and Adenauer met for the first time and would become close friends and allies. Despite his personal preference for de Gaulle, the latter's overthrow would not prevent Adenauer from dealing with Maurice Challe and his co-putschists. Adenauer considered running for the position of Bundespräsident at this time, but pulled out when he discovered that under the Basic Law, the president held far less power than had been the case under the Weimar Republic. His withdrawal from that campaign reflected poorly on the old politician due to the blatant obviousness of the abortive power-grab. Under US pressure to create somewhat of a constructive relationship with Eastern European states, but unable to recognise the Oder-Neisse Line and Czech Sudetenland due to the Heimatvertriebenen maintaining importance in political matters, Adenauer began secret talks to draft non-aggression pacts with Poland and Czechoslovakia. In late 1959, the CDU was embarrassed by international media picking up on (as it turns out, unfounded) rumours that Theodor Oberländer, Minister of Refugees, had commanded the ethnically-Ukrainian Nachtigall ("nightingale") battalion which was in Lviv on 2-4 July 1941 when a large pogrom occurred, with the implication that he was involved in war crimes.

20--todestag-von-franz-josef-strauss-gallerypicture-1_900x510.jpg

Chancellor Franz Josef Strauss, giving an empassioned speech about the necessity of combating communist subversion

In the 1961 election, failing to achieve a majority, Adenauer had to include the FDP in a coalition government, but the FDP demanded that Adenauer had to give up the chancellorship before the end of his turn and replace the foreign minister. In 1962, scandal emerged when Strauss had five Der Spiegel journalists arrested, charging them with espionage for publishing a memo exposing inadequacies in the Bundeswehr. Adenauer defended Strauss and despite pressure to do so, refused to dismiss Strauss [132]. Adenauer tried to block Ludwig Erhard, his Economic Minister and architect of the Wirtschaftwunder, from becoming chancellor but failed. In October 1963, he turned over the chancellorship to Erhard, although Adenauer remained chairman of the CDU until his resignation in December 1966. Erhard tried to orient the FRG towards an Atlanticist policy, he proved to be fairly inept at international relations. He attempted to buy reunification of Germany from the USSR for a $25 billion 'loan' that he never expected to be repaid. The USSR flatly refused. In 1966, Strauss, having masterminded (with Adenauer's involvement) a merger of the CSU and CDU, became chancellor of a CDU (now including the CSU) and SPD alliance, rising to the chancellorship [133]. Strauss strengthened ties between France and Germany, whilst virtually throwing away most ties with the British. He also diplomatically antagonised the GDR, and as was revealed years later, initiated the program of BND support for Croatian terrorists, who became increasingly active in the 1970s and 1980s.

===

[131] IOTL, the Spandau Seven, but ITTL, the Soviets accepted Grand Admiral Erich Raeder's offer to advise them on naval affairs.
[132] IOTL, Strauss was expelled.
[133] IOTL, Kurt Georg Kiesinger became chancellor and the CSU didn't merge with the CDU.
 
Last edited:
[Zoidberg]Hooray, I'm helping [/Zoidberg]

Given the chronology, there might be some crossover between the tail end of public awareness of Lysenkoism and the first realisations of the effects of radioactive contamination on the food chain, which ought to have a solid impact on the scifi of the era. It'll probably be a huge aid to the nuclear disarmament movement worldwide, too - if American bomber crews can nuke their own country by accident, what might they do to ours. Conversely, it may also strengthen the position of "winnable" nuclear wars, as the damage is less than apocalyptic, and it may encourage efforts in the direction of the so-called nuclear battlefield. If LeMay is forced out and SAC onto the back foot, that may also reinvigorate the USN's ambitions towards the strategic deterrence role. It may also have a strategic effect in the USAF - if strategic bombing (which in this era largely means nuclear bombing) is taken away from piloted craft, then USAF may see bombing missions as largely tactical, as they don't have the examples of OTL's Linebacker and Linebacker II to show the utility of traditional WW2-esque area bombing.

That's actually some pretty good points about the development of military doctrine. Do you think its possible that with a stronger USN influence on strategic deterrence that the USAF may be largely sidelined to a "home defence"/interception role? Maybe that's taking it too far, but with the CAGs and so on, the USN already has the ability to project airpower even without the USAF. On the other hand though, you can't exactly base strategic bombers on an aircraft carrier.

There is gonna be a big influence on the peace movement, particularly in Europe, of the Goldsboro incident, which is likely to percolate into the generally radical European landscape of the 1970s.

Could we revisit India soonish? The last update that I can recall was a fairly short one in which there was a Saffron Revolution?

Yeah I have to admit, given how big that change was, the update was criminally-short. India won't be the very next update, but it will be relatively soon. I have a few interesting things to write about in terms of geopolitics involving India, but is there anything else about India you would like to know (just so I know what to research, I won't pretend to be an expert on India).

Also, you long ago pledged periodic culture and sport based updates.

Yes I did, and I should be held to my word. If its any consolation, I've been starting to spitball some ideas about the development of music, and have been searching up things like Soviet rugby. That being said, I think the divergences in sport are going to be a lot more significant and exciting over time, rather than necessarily in the 1960s. Also please be forgiving, because with the exception of some sports (boxing, olympic wrestling etc) I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to sport. :eek:

360d1ece12c5e46f38347b8704e0ad9a32cc3e19dfc4c09a209d4bf15705a521.jpg
 
Last edited:
What's the status of the relationship between FRG and Canaan?
It's must be easier for the FRG to establish diplomatic relations with Canaan without OTL Jewish majority in the latter, also, no reparations agreement? this must mean Canaan's economic will stagnate in the coming decades, together without massive Jewish immigration from the West and bad relations with the Arab world.
 
What's the status of the relationship between FRG and Canaan?
It's must be easier for the FRG to establish diplomatic relations with Canaan without OTL Jewish majority in the latter, also, no reparations agreement? this must mean Canaan's economic will stagnate in the coming decades, together without massive Jewish immigration from the West and bad relations with the Arab world.

Yeah Canaan is kind of a bizarre one. The FRG has diplomatic relations with Canaan, and were supporters of the Suez campaign, but I think there is a limit to their closeness due to the presence of a lot of Nazis still around (especially without Mossad to hunt them down). Canaan is still seen as a Judenstaat to the Germans, but they're more than willing to sell them arms, and Canaan doesn't kick too much of a fuss up about the Holocaust, given their awkward rejection of Jewish identity necessitates a break with even the recent past. Canaan's economy will be very backwards anyway, given that they haven't attracted the right kind of settlers to create a healthy business sector. Compared to the UAR, they're a shrimp, and they're becoming more so with every year that goes by. Canaan is becoming a real backwater, though I should really make an update about them sometime in the near future because they haven't got enough attention.
 
Yeah Canaan is kind of a bizarre one. The FRG has diplomatic relations with Canaan, and were supporters of the Suez campaign, but I think there is a limit to their closeness due to the presence of a lot of Nazis still around (especially without Mossad to hunt them down). Canaan is still seen as a Judenstaat to the Germans, but they're more than willing to sell them arms, and Canaan doesn't kick too much of a fuss up about the Holocaust, given their awkward rejection of Jewish identity necessitates a break with even the recent past. Canaan's economy will be very backwards anyway, given that they haven't attracted the right kind of settlers to create a healthy business sector. Compared to the UAR, they're a shrimp, and they're becoming more so with every year that goes by. Canaan is becoming a real backwater, though I should really make an update about them sometime in the near future because they haven't got enough attention.

So, what about the Jews who immigrated to Canaan before WWII? especially from western Europa, many were capitalists and established factories and small businesses, with Canaan remaining backwater they will probably emigrate back to Europa or America.
 
That's actually some pretty good points about the development of military doctrine. Do you think its possible that with a stronger USN influence on strategic deterrence that the USAF may be largely sidelined to a "home defence"/interception role? Maybe that's taking it too far, but with the CAGs and so on, the USN already has the ability to project airpower even without the USAF. On the other hand though, you can't exactly base strategic bombers on an aircraft carrier.

You actually kinda can, from the late 1960s - as SAMs and supersonic interceptors proliferated, and shift in strategic bombing was to low-level nape of the earth bombers, like the British TSR-2 and the US FB-111. The latter had an ill-fated attempt made to shoehorn it into a carrier fighter under Robert McNamara, but it was certainly carrier capable and could potentially have served as a supersonic strike aircraft.

I think that with the European battlefield in the minds of the USAF, they're never going to be solely defensive - they need to win the air war against the Soviets over Germany, and to do that they need to strike offensively at Warsaw Pact targets. I don't think you'd see a US equivalent to the British 1957 White Paper, for example. There could be a flirtation with missiles under a particular President or Secretary of Defense - it'd be possible if there was a visible failure of the fighter/interceptor branch that you might have a couple of years where there is a push to let air defence be handled by SAMs, strike missions by cruise missiles and SRBMs, strategic deterrence by SLBMs and ICBMs and so forth, but IMO it would peter out pretty quickly when the limitations of that approach become known. What could be interesting ITTL is that one of the effects of the Yom Kippur War and Vietnam was the USAF giving serious respect to Soviet air defence systems, as they demonstrated that they were so effective that the abovementioned switch from high-level supersonic bombing was made.

Actually, on the European battlefield - with France being a bit of a pariah, Belgium gone and Germany feeling anti-American, how's NATO travelling these days?
 
So, what about the Jews who immigrated to Canaan before WWII? especially from western Europa, many were capitalists and established factories and small businesses, with Canaan remaining backwater they will probably emigrate back to Europa or America.

Exactly. Many of them go to Britain, the US, Canada or Australia. I think there's still a pretty negative association with what they went through in continental Europe, so not many of them are going back to, say, Germany or France.

Actually, on the European battlefield - with France being a bit of a pariah, Belgium gone and Germany feeling anti-American, how's NATO travelling these days?

NATO still exists and is functional for now, although increasingly it will be turning into a means of coordinating two distinct forces, an Anglo-American and a European one, together. What will be awkward is that American and French interests outside of Europe are going to get increasingly incompatible, but within Europe they have an interest in anti-Soviet solidarity.
 
So, the FRG doesn't recognize the Oder-Neisse line? If I'm understanding this right this could have some interesting effects.
 
About Canaan's non-Jewish identity, the really big changes aren't necessarily going to be the OTL immigrants to Israel from Western Europe during this time period. There are large preexisting communities, especially in the US, which the Wallace administration and the Eisenhower administration will be more than happy to take in (maybe less so Dewey, but that's a coin flip). This could strengthen the Yiddish language to some extent, as well as buttress the American left- the Jewish community has long punched above its weight in terms of contributions to left-wing thought in the US.

It's interesting to think about the idea of Kibbutzim possibly seeing the light of day in rural Canada, Australia, or the US. But maybe that's an idea that will just never form with preexisting ways to adapt already available in those countries.

Anyway, what's interesting to me is what will happen to the Jews remaining behind the Iron Curtain. Do they stay put? Is there a more serious effort to concentrate the population in the Far East? If they stay, does the SU force integration? I can imagine Canaan *really* doesn't want the large Ultra-Orthodox populations of Eastern Europe to get a toe-hold in their country, as they're incompatible with state ideology (likely domestic terrorism nightmare if they do arrive). But would the Soviets tolerate their opting out of socialist life to largely study the Talmud?

And then on a smaller scale, there's Ethiopia to think of. Clearly the Jewish population there do not qualify as "Canaanites."

Some interesting things to ponder, there...

About sports, I for one vote against more frequent posts that might only cover a decade. I think 2-3 more sweeping posts, each one covering 25 years or so, would serve you better. Especially if they're a topic you're not totally into, it means less delving into detail.

Pop culture is tougher to avoid decade-by-decade, but you've started working bits and pieces into the TL already (monster movies and swim suits, for example), and that's good color. I think when you get a brainwave, write it in, but no need to force it. Can we assume that pop culture is trending towards freedom of expression and increasing permissiveness, similar to OTL? The big picture directional stuff is really what's important if you're integrating pop culture elements into a largely political TL, as they help describe how political change happens.

But if you are looking for some ideas, I have at least a couple where the US is concerned.:)
 
About sports, I for one vote against more frequent posts that might only cover a decade. I think 2-3 more sweeping posts, each one covering 25 years or so, would serve you better. Especially if they're a topic you're not totally into, it means less delving into detail.

Pop culture is tougher to avoid decade-by-decade, but you've started working bits and pieces into the TL already (monster movies and swim suits, for example), and that's good color. I think when you get a brainwave, write it in, but no need to force it. Can we assume that pop culture is trending towards freedom of expression and increasing permissiveness, similar to OTL? The big picture directional stuff is really what's important if you're integrating pop culture elements into a largely political TL, as they help describe how political change happens.

But if you are looking for some ideas, I have at least a couple where the US is concerned.:)

Yeah, I think that infrequent sports quotes probably make more sense, although it will probably have to focus on particular sports for updates to have enough detail to do the subject justice.

I think that pop culture is trending towards freedom of expression, but that it is becoming more polarised and ideological even than OTL. Ideology has always influenced cinema but did so strongest in the 50s and the early 60s. This trend is likely to continue for longer than OTL, and the 'exotic' is going to become more important in American cinema. To an extent this was the case in European cinema, even if it got reduced to fetishistic mondo films and the like. I can also see avant-garde films become more popular in 'mainstream' American cinema, likely from the 1970s onwards.
 
Chapter 43: The Hesychast - Eastern Europe (1960s)
The Hesychast: Eastern Europe in the Sixties

For more information about Eastern European politics (in the 1950s), see:

https://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showpost.php?p=8866211&postcount=102

https://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showpost.php?p=8960731&postcount=110

===

The 1960s saw a major generational shift within much of the Eastern Bloc, continuing the process of liberalisation experienced with Khrushchev's de-Stalinisation policies. Political figures whom had dared to speak out against the atmosphere of fear and paranoia which characterised High Stalinism now began to question whether the status quo achieved post-Stalin needed to be altered further to reflect the development of socialism.

One of the clearest examples of this generational shift was the rise of Alexander Dubček and his wide-ranging reform of Czechoslovakia's economic and political system. De-Stalinisation had progressed half-heartedly in Czechoslovakia, which by the late 1950s had one of the most repressive and backward societies in the Eastern Bloc, a far cry from the traditional democratic tradition which had defined the Czech core of the country historically. Antonín Novotný had, however, followed the lead of Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev in promulgating a new constitution and rehabilitating victims of the Stalinist era, although the latter only occurred in 1967. By the early 1960s, Czechoslovakia experienced economic downturn. The large existing industrial base of the country limited the growth which could be achieved in Stalinist-style heavy industry-focused central planning, leading the country's coffers to be tugged into a vortex of diminishing returns. Novotný's attempt at spurring economic growth, the 1965 New Economic Model was largely unsuccessful at this, although it did generate increased demand for political reform. Easing of rules surrounding censorship led to more frequent open discontent, especially by critics of the regime within the Union of Czechoslovak Writers.

Novotný's lack of popularity led to his replacement as First Secretary by Alexander Dubček in 1968. Novotný also resigned the presidency and was replaced in that capacity by Ludvik Svoboda. Right after Dubček's rise, Eduard Goldstücker became chairman of the Union of Czechoslovak Writers and thus editor-in-chief of the journal Literární noviny. He tested Dubček's liberalism by criticising Novotný openly on public television and exposing all of Novotný's previously unreported policies. Goldstücker suffered no repercussions, and Dubček began to build a sense of trust among media, government and citizens. The journal's name was changed to Literární listy, with the first censor-free copy released on 29th February 1968. By August 1968, it had a circulation of 300,000, making it the most-published periodical in Europe.

image.jpg

Alexander Dubček receives acclaim (and roses) from working class supporters

On February 21st 1968, Dubček announced in a speech marking the 20th anniversary of Czechoslovakia's "Victorious February", explaining the need for change following the triumph of socialism. He emphasised the need to "enforce the leading role of the party more effectively" and acknowledging that the Party had often been too heavy-handed on trivial issues. Dubček declared the Party's mission as to "build an advanced socialist society on sound economic foundations... a socialism that corresponds to the historical democratic traditions of Czechoslovakia, in accordance with the experience of other communist parties".

In April, Dubček launched the "Action Programme" of liberalisations, including increased freedom of the press, freedom of speech and freedom of movement. Economically, he emphasised the production of consumer goods, in accordance with his view that "socialism cannot mean only liberation of the working people from the domination of exploiting class relations, but must make provisions for a fuller life of the personality than any bourgeois democracy". He promised to limit the power of the Czechoslovak secret police (the StB). He federalised the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, dividing it internally into Czech and Slovak regions. Notably, Dubček promoted forming good relations with the West, whilst also maintaining involvement in the Warsaw Pact. He draped his programme in ideological jargon, although there was some concern in Moscow as it became clear that he considered his tenure to be a 10-year transition to democratic elections. Although the Action Programme stipulated that the reform must proceed under the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia (Komunistická strana Československa, KSČ), pressure grew for immediate implementation and anti-Soviet polemics appeared in the press.

The social democrats in particular proved problematic, and began to form a separate, if unofficial, political organisation. Party conservatives urged repression, but Dubček counselled moderation. At the Presidium of the KSČ in April, Dubček and reemphasised KSČ leadership announced "socialism with a human face". In May, he announced that the Fourteenth Party Congress would convene in an early session on September 9th. Congress would incorporate the Action Programme into the party statutes, draft a federalisation law and elect a new Central Committee. Debate over how to combat the declining competitiveness of Czechoslovak exports, whether to utilised mixed economics or introduce reform to predominantly socialist modes of production. On June 27th, Ludvik Vaculik, a leading author and journalist, published a manifesto titled The Two Thousand Words, expressing concern about conservative elements within the KSČ and so-called "foreign forces". Vaculik called on the people to take the initiative in implementing the reform programme. Dubček and the Party vociferously denounced Vaculik's manifesto.

Dubček represented an important shift in the methods of socialist cultural import. Many of the communist parties in Eastern Europe gained legitimacy through loosening the reins on their populaces. The permissive intellectual atmosphere that started to arise in places like Czechoslovakia also allowed critical interpretation of Marxist tenets and of pre-existing socialist policies. It increasing became the prevailing view that because socialism had not yet reached its own end of history, it is necessary to continue to improve the collective wellbeing of socialist societies. One of the gems of liberalisation in the Eastern Bloc was the emergence (and good international performance) of the Czechoslovak New Wave in cinema. Based in students of the Film and TV School of the Academy of Performing Arts in Prague (FAMU), Czechoslovak New Wave films were characterised by criticism of the communist government and the disconnect between individuals and the bureaucracy which dominated the social management in the country. They tended to feature dark or absurd humour, long unscripted dialogues and casting of non-professional actors. Major directors included Miloš Forman, Jiří Menzel and Jan Němec. Notable films include The Firemen's Ball (Forman, 1967), Zert (English title: The Joke - Jaromil Jireš, 1969) and Sedmikrásky (English title: Daisies - Věra Chytilová, 1966).

big.jpg

Typical film poster of the Czechoslovak New Wave era

Poland's steps towards reform in the 1960s were far less dramatic, though no less significant, than in Czechoslovakia. Based in the Lwow-Warsaw school of thought, Polish academics spent much of the decade gradually developing a "specifically Polish form of Marxism". Whilst Gomułka had been instrumental in the reform of Poland in the 1950s, by the 1960s it was apparent that he had become comparatively set in his ways. Spontaneously-formed workers' self-management councils that were formed in 1956 had been neutralised two years later. Roman Zambrowski, a notable member of the liberal wing of the Polish Communist Party (Polska Zjednoczona Partia Robotnicza, PZPR), was expelled in 1963 at the XIII Plenum of the Central Committee, which is widely agreed as marking a halt in the ongoing process of political liberalisation. As early as 1957, leading Polish academic and ideologue Leszek Kołakowski was verbally attacked by Gomułka[134]. In March 1964, thirty-four Polish intellectuals sent Gomułka an open letter criticising the tenacious and omnipresent censorship of media outlets by his government.

1101561210_400.jpg

Gomułka appears on TIME Magazine cover from 1956

Challenges to Gomułka's leadership were also germinating from within the Party. Two primary factions began to emerge: the technocratic wing, led by Edward Gierek, and the so-called "Partisan" clique, led by Interior Minister Mieczysław Moczar. These internal fissures coincided with a noticeable increase in tension with the Catholic Church within Poland, whose acts of defiance, whilst minor had continued to increase in frequency. This was only made worse by the departure of the Znak faction of Catholic deputies from the Sejm. From 1968 onwards, soul-searching in other Eastern Bloc countries, especially in Czechoslovakia, influenced the Polish movements for greater freedom of expression. Gomułka didn't prove to be the only opposition to the so-called "free speech" movement in Poland. 1968 saw Moczar launch an anti-intellectual press campaign in the immediate aftermath of student protests at Warsaw University. Held to protest the banning of the play Dziady from playwright Adam Mickiewicz, which was accused by the regime of having "Russophobic and anti-Soviet references". The protests devolved into violence when ORMO units attacked the students, forcibly dispersing the demonstrators. This was met with more major protests by workers and students, especially in Gdansk. The Partisan faction proved incapable of placing themselves in control of the state apparatus, however, allowing Gomułka to reassert himself. He couldn't tread water forever, however, and Gomułka was expelled from the premiership in December 1970 after large-scale protests in Gdansk, Gdynia, Elblag and Szczecin, with the PZPR instead installing Edward Gierek as First Secretary. Several of Gomułka's collaborators, such as Zenon Kliszko and Stanisław Kociołek, were also expelled from the Sejm, virtually annihilating the conservative wing of the PZPR.

Lucretiu_Patrascanu_2.jpg

Romanian leader Lucrețiu Pătrășcanu, 1957-1967

Romania had always been somewhat of a misfit within the Eastern Bloc, with the policies of it's communist party, the Partidul Comunist Român (PCR) had always tended towards the experimental. Having been in power since 1957, Lucrețiu Pătrășcanu had attempted to ingrain socialist values in the population through a combination of land reform (nationalising all land in Romania, including peasant small-holdings) and social engineering projects aimed at the creation of a "new national solidarity". Whilst experimental media was freely-allowed, and even encouraged, whilst the Party remained in control of the context in which that media would be shown and thus allowed final control over what would enter the popular discourse whilst maintaining a facade of liberalism. This meant that Romanian music and film was some of the most technically cutting-edge in the entirety of the communist world, even if certain subjects, such as in-depth moralisation or existentialism contrary to Marxist tenets, were off-limits. Perhaps because of the unorthodoxy of his policies, Pătrășcanu is a highly controversial figure amongst historians of Romania. Supporters point out that his social engineering projects promoted social cohesion, an increase in urban living satisfaction due to greater access to entertainment, the revitalisation of the urban artistic communities, and for moving away from a purely economic to a more sophisticated sociological understanding of Marxism. By contrast, his detractors point out that his policies atrophied rural Romania's development, created an intense personal dependence on the state for individual Romanians and contributed to a sense of aimlessness after his fall from grace. Pătrășcanu is also significant in his development of close relations with the Romanian Orthodox Church, primarily through his close friend and theological Gala Galaction. Despite traditional Marxist hostility towards religion, Galaction and Pătrășcanu saw it as possible to "build the narthex of socialism with the spirit as well as the body and mind".

250px-Alexandru_Dr%C4%83ghici.jpg

Alexandru Drăghici, self-styled "Premier Vanguardist" of the Socialist Republic of Romania

Pătrășcanu's experiments with avant-garde socialism increasingly came under attack from 1965, when opposition within the security forces took advantage of his deterioration in health (caused by an autoimmune disease) which eventuated with his death in 1967. In the meantime, political maneuvering and the panic of conservatives within the Great National Assembly prompted by student and rural workers' protests led to the rise of Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior Alexandru Drăghici to the position of President of the State Council. Drăghici is widely considered to have been disastrous for Romania. Although he maintained Romania's presence in the Warsaw Pact and thus the formal alliance between Romania and the USSR, under the surface relations were tense between the Soviets and the strongly nationalist and autocratic Drăghici. Drăghici would unlease security forces on ethnic Hungarians, Jews and clergy, motivated by both his Romanian nationalism and pathological and obsessive hatred of religion. In particular he clamped down on the Orthodox monasteries and the hesychasm, which he saw as a breeding ground for crypto-fascists. Drăghici also stepped up the "reeducation" programmes which he had been performing since 1963, which would develop into a whole informal sector ruled by Drăghici and his cronies in the 1970s, resembling a mafia more than a government. Most of this enterprise was centered in Bucharest, where spoilt children of various communist leaders throughout Asia, Africa and Eastern Europe would engage in decadent hedonism. Drăghici was also notorious for disinformation campaigns utilised to extort funds from the United States and other western governments in exchange for defectors who had been highly-overvalued.

To the south, the People's Republic of Bulgaria had consistently fewer issues with their Soviet patrons. After Stalin's death in 1953, his puppet Chervenkov lost control of the country and was succeeded by Todor Zhivkov as Party Secretary in 1954. Two years later, Chervenkov was also replaced as Prime Minister by Anton Yugov. Zhivkov normalised relations with Yugoslavia, denounced the trials and executions of alleged Titoists such as Traicho Kostov, restored limited freedom of expression and ended persecution of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. By the 1960s economic reform was introduced authorising the free sale and purchase of surplus, incentivising productivity for ordinary Bulgarian workers. An upturn in economic performance was also assisted by revitalisation of the Black Sea tourist industry and the production of relatively rare goods in the Eastern Bloc such as tobacco and chocolate. In 1962, Yugov retired and Zhivkov became undisputed leader of Bulgaria, holding both the Party Secretariat and the Prime Ministership. Zhivkov would remain in power in Bulgaria throughout the 1960s.

6046551_orig.jpg

Hungarian communist poster

The People's Republic of Hungary experienced continuation throughout the 1960s with the principles of Imre Nagy's "New Course" in socialism. Despite satisfaction with the loosening of social controls, Hungary suffered from the economic stagnation that affected the entirety of the Eastern Bloc in the early 1960s. To cope, the Hungarian authorities introduced the New Economic Mechanism, a strategy to shift towards Yugoslav-style decentralised planning and introducing limited market mechanisms. The latter manifested itself in the introduction of a three-tier pricing system. Prices on luxuries or goods which comprise a small percentage of individual expenditure were allowed to float, whilst products without substitutes were given a window of fluctuation. Only material and basic goods that were considered key to strictly regulated for stability were given fixed prices. By 1966, Nagy passed away of an illness that had afflicted him since 1962 and was mourned by thousands on the streets of Budapest. He was replaced by Marxist theoretician and Minister of Culture György Lukács. Lukács is often considered somewhat of a (comparatively) conservative Hungarian version of Pătrășcanu, emphasising the role of participation in civic life and of recreation in the construction of a socialist society. Whilst Lukács much preferred the traditional, realist aesthetic, his intellectual sophistication was evident in his management of cultural affairs, leading to a number of European cult classics in Hungarian cinema. Whilst less popular than Romanian films of the period due to a lack of 'flair', Hungarian cinema has gained a reputation as being extremely high-brow, even pretentious. Lukács promoted economic reform as well, promoting a more complex form of Dubček's doctrine that without "satisfaction of personality greater than any afforded in a bourgeois democracy", that socialism could not triumph. The Hungarian form of this was based largely on Lukács' own developments of the theory of reification.

In the most liberal of Warsaw Pact nations, Finland, there was a strong continuation of existing policy. Since the postwar period, Finland had experienced strong economic growth through the exploitation of its two major raw material resources: the so called metalliteollisuus and the metsäteollisuus. Metalliteollisuus refers to mineral-based economic activity, limited not only to mining and production of metals, but also shipbuilding, metalworking, automobile manufacture and electronics. Metsäteollisuus are forestry-based industry, also including timber processing, pulp and paper production etc. In the 1960s the Finnish economy started to diversify, funneling capital into the improvement of human resources with which to create the embryo of a knowledge economy.

tuure-lehen.jpg

Finnish President Tuure Lehén

Politically, the Finnish Democratic Republic had been led throughout the late 1940s and the 1950s by Aimo Aaltonen and Otto Wille Kuusinen. With Kuusinen's death in 1964, he was succeeded as First Secretary of the Finnish Communist Party (Suomen Kommunistinen Puolue, SKP) and Prime Minister by his daughter Hertta Elina Kuusinen, who became the first female head of government in a communist state. A few years later, in 1967, Aaltonen retired and was replaced as President by Minister of Internal Affairs Tuure Lehén. Asked about the reasons for his resignation, Aaltonen replied that "I have spent much of my life devoted to revolution, and it warms my heart in this cold land that I have not only lived to see socialism achieved in my home, but that I could have had such an important part to play in it. Nevertheless I will be retiring to spend time with family, although I will always be there if ever Finland needs me, as long as I shall breath".

In the Popular Republic of Greece, the transition to younger, more liberal politicians that happened elsewhere in the mid-1960s actually occurred in the 1950s. With the passing away of Svolos, the position of First Secretary was filled by Nikos Beloyannis, who promoted tourism, liberalisation of the media and started to introduce measures to promote worker's self management in the Greek economy. The Greeks also funneled Soviet aid money into the expansion of their merchant navy, which quickly became the third-largest in the communist bloc, behind only the Soviet Union and China. Yugoslavia followed closely behind in fourth place. Beloyannis would remain leader throughout the 1960s, and promoted Greece's pristine image, providing subsidies to owners of vineyards or olive gardens in order to fit his favourite slogan, "Socialism in the Sun". Despite growth in these marginal sectors, overall Greece experienced as much, if not greater economic stagnation in the 1960s.

a-large-poster-advertising-the-kke-building.jpg

A KKE (Communist Party of Greece) poster overlooks the empty streets of Athens on Sunday

===

[134] IOTL, he was expelled from the PZPR in 1966 and emigrated in 1968, but ITTL he is not expelled, even though he is unpopular with conservatives.
 
Last edited:
Very interested to see what happens with Czechslovakia and their Prague Spring analogue here. IIRC most of these reform movements are OTL, but had to go low-key after the invasion - excepting, of course, Romania.
 
Very interested to see what happens with Czechslovakia and their Prague Spring analogue here. IIRC most of these reform movements are OTL, but had to go low-key after the invasion - excepting, of course, Romania.

Yes, the majority of the reforms are OTL, although as the timeline goes on they are going to grow in a slightly-different direction. That being said, worker's self-management is a little more popular than OTL in the Eastern Bloc.

Romania is the one that is the weirdest in the Eastern Bloc. Pătrășcanu's experiments weren't seen IOTL and have given the country a bit of an atmosphere of a creepy town where everything seems nice but you get the feeling its not quite right. Drăghici is also a lot worse than Ceaucescu, who essentially got sidelined in the 1950s with Pătrășcanu's rise. In a lot of ways Bucharest is going to be the "if you can afford it, it goes" place in Europe ITTL, with negative repercussions for Romania's international reputation, not to mention for its actual citizenry.
 
In a lot of ways Bucharest is going to be the "if you can afford it, it goes" place in Europe ITTL, with negative repercussions for Romania's international reputation, not to mention for its actual citizenry.

Depending on circumstances, that could be as much cause for intervention by the Warsaw Pact as Czechoslovakia's reforms were IOTL. Deviationism and bourgeois decadence, etc.
 
Depending on circumstances, that could be as much cause for intervention by the Warsaw Pact as Czechoslovakia's reforms were IOTL. Deviationism and bourgeois decadence, etc.

Of course, although Kosygin seems to have been opposed (at least initially) to intervention within the communist bloc. Also, he didn't believe that the Sino-Soviet split was irrevocable, thinking that even communists that have gone "off course" could be rehabilitated. This means he's less likely to have the tanks roll into Bucharest. This could always change with later premiers, however.
 
Top