The Giant’s Vigor: An early exit from the Great Depression

Foreword

Foreword​

I came up with the premise of this story while reading Destructive Creation by Mark Wilson, a book about the US government’s role in economic mobilization during the Second World War. The original plan was to have a US that relies more heavily on government owned and perhaps operated factories but the scope expanded.

In my continued reading on the Great Depression, I was reminded that the 1930s were a time of enormous productivity improvements: an under-discussed fact due to the dominance of the Great Depression. In fact, that decade had the fastest total factor productivity growth of any decade in American history before or since(Alexander Field has some great work on this). Despite the rapid growth during the Great Depression, so much more could’ve been accomplished.

In March 1933, industrial production was 52.2% lower than its all-time high of July 1929. By July 1933, it was less than 25% below the apex. The rest of the year would see a slip back to 39% below the peak as NIRA was passed among other mistakes. It would take until August 1935 to reach the production of July 1933. This story hopes to keep the mid 1933 trend going until full employment is restored significantly earlier than OTL. America shall build a bridge over Okun’s Gap with a metric ton of Harbeger triangles or die trying.

In addition to Destructive Creation, I made heavy use of The Midas Paradox by Scott Sumner to track the 1929-1933 economy. The first 4 years will act in large part as a summary of the narrative portions of his book with some additions such as changed figures, an alternate inflation measure and Robert Higgs’ work on tracking hours of work from 1929 to 1950. As the situation develops, events will drift away from OTL’s depression and recovery so Sumner’s work will be used less. If you don’t care for a somewhat dry recap of the macroeconomy with slight changes, I’ll provide a comparison between the US upon the presidential election OTL and TTL at the end.

I have also been making use of George Selgin’s series of blog posts on the Great Depression. Sumner, Selgin and Higgs are all libertarians slant while Wilson is a defender of the public sector. So far I’ve also been reading The Big ‘L’ which I do not know the political ideology of. Alternate sources are welcome especially if they’re on the shorter side and make heavy use of quantitative data.

All of this was written in R Markdown to allow me to keep track of and manipulate data much more effectively, create graphs and tables and directly query dataframes to make sure changes are pushed everywhere. If someone wants the source code I can make a github. Feedback on plausibility is also welcome and I’m happy to change things around.
Industrial_Production_1933.png
 
Last edited:
Chapter 1: The Contraction

Chapter 1: The Contraction​

1929​

The New York Democratic Party had manpower problems. William Hackett was planning to run for governor but would die in 1926 after a traumatic brain injury sustained from a car crash in Cuba. The party then pushed for Edwin Corning who would also suffer health issues and decline to run. On and on it went, to Robert Wagner, George Lunn and Peter Ten Eyck who would all fail to receive enough support. Eventually, former governor and current presidential candidate Al Smith would endorse one Franklin Delano Roosevelt, fifth cousin of ex-president Theodore Roosevelt and former Assistant Secretary of the Navy. Roosevelt had given a speech in favor of Smith in 1924 and would continue to support him into 1928, which might have lead to him clinching Smith's support. He would run on a campaign of anti-corruption and be inaugurated as Governor of New York on January 1st, 1929 after winning by a narrow margin of 49 to 48%.

On March 4th, Herbert Hoover, Industrialist and Humanitarian extraordinaire would be inaugurated as president of the United States after 8 years as the republican Secretary of Commerce. Voters liked what they saw in their pocket books and Hoover would win in a blowout 58.2 to 40.8% against Al Smith, preserving continuous republican rule since the end of the Great War. It was a time of hope as markets repeatedly rallied in expectation of future growth.

Following the health decline and eventual death of Benjamin Strong in October 1928, the expansionary policies of the New York Fed were reduced. Rather than trying to accommodate the overvalued pound, George Harrison was convinced there was a bubble in the stock market and the exuberance must be quashed. Harrison convinced the board to increase the discount rate from 5 to 6% on August 9th. The Bank of England would respond by reducing its discount rate but gold would rapidly drain out of the economy before they were forced to raise rates again on September 29th. August saw a 1% decline in industrial production from the July peak as market volatility increased.

On October 28th, confidence collapsed and the Dow dropped 13% in an event known as Black Monday. The next day, the Dow declined an additional 12% bringing the aggregate down to 198. The markets could feel in their bones that something was deeply wrong in America. October's industrial production was 3.4% lower than July. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York had gotten their wish, equity prices had dropped from their earlier highs.

Across New York, folks would gossip about stock traders leaping out of skyscrapers following the precipitous falls. Despite its plausibility, suicides were rare after the crash. According to the Chief Medical Examiner of New York, Charles Norris, only 44 suicides had occurred in the month of and after the crash compared to 53 in the same period of 1928. However, suicide rates would continue to rise in response to general economic malaise, peaking in 1932, 20% higher than they were in 1929.
The New York Fed responded by dropping the discount rate back down to 5% on November 1st, wanting to accommodate the plunge without doing anything too expansionary which would repeat the mistakes leading to the "bubble". The markets continued to plunge, reaching half of their peak in mid-November. They lowered rates once more to 4.5% on November 15th. November's Industrial production was 8.1% lower than July.

In 1929 the US economy was 104.6 billion dollars strong with 120.4 billion hours worked across the nation. Layoffs had been rolling for the last couple months as production dropped. Avid readers of newspapers would notice the disconcerting absence of help wanted requests in between pages on stock market drops and factory closures.



1930​

Despite a moderate improvement in the stock market, with the Dow reaching 267, the New York Federal Reserve reduced the discount rate to 4% on February 7th, citing continued declines in industrial production—now 12.5% below July's peak.

"The Dow continued to rise, peaking at 294 in March. However, industrial production slipped further, 13.9% below its peak by that time. In response, the New York Federal Reserve cut the discount rate to 3.5% on March 14th. Further cuts followed: down to 3% on May 2nd, while the Dow stabilized but industrial production dropped to 15.9% below the previous July.

June brought another rate cut on the 20th while the Dow dropped precipitously. The senate passed the most extreme tariff proposal in US history by a 44-42 vote on the 17th, prompting retaliatory tariffs across the world, further lowering international trade. Industrial production was 18.3% under the apex and the situation would continue to slip the Fed's control.

Despite the rate cut, by December, industrial production plummeted to 30.5% below its July 1929 level, and the Dow hit a year low of 157. The New York Federal Reserve lowered its discount rate once more to 2% in an attempt to stabilize the economy.

Through the latter half of 1930, bank closures became a common story across America. According to Gary Richardson of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond:

Caldwell was a rapidly expanding conglomerate and the largest financial holding company in the South. It provided its clients with an array of services – banking, brokerage, insurance – through an expanding chain controlled by its parent corporation headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee. The parent got into trouble when its leaders invested too heavily in securities markets and lost substantial sums when stock prices declined. In order to cover their own losses, the leaders drained cash from the corporations that they controlled.​
On November 7, one of Caldwell’s principal subsidiaries, the Bank of Tennessee (Nashville) closed its doors. On November 12 and 17, Caldwell affiliates in Knoxville, Tennessee, and Louisville, Kentucky, also failed. The failures of these institutions triggered a correspondent cascade that forced scores of commercial banks to suspend operations. In communities where these banks closed, depositors panicked and withdrew funds en masse from other banks. Panic spread from town to town. Within a few weeks, hundreds of banks suspended operations. About one-third of these organizations reopened within a few months, but the majority were liquidated.​
Panic began to subside in early December. But on December 11, the fourth-largest bank in New York City, Bank of United States, ceased operations. The bank had been negotiating to merge with another institution. The New York Fed had helped with the search for a merger partner. When negotiations broke down, depositors rushed to withdraw funds, and New York’s superintendent of banking closed the institution. This event, like the collapse of Caldwell, generated newspaper headlines throughout the United States, stoking fears of financial panics and currency shortages like the panic of 1907 and inducing jittery depositors to withdraw funds from other banks.​

On December 12, Columbia University hosted a lecture by British economist John Maynard Keynes, who discussed the recent recession and potential responses. Frightened by the bank collapse, Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt, attended the event to see his acquaintance from the peace negotiations. (Point of Divergence: FDR is somewhat healthier and becomes friends with Keynes during Versailles rather than Hoover doing so). The two would catch up and promise to talk to each other more.

By the end of 1930, only 112.7 billion labor hours were recorded, representing a decline of 6.4% from the previous year. The Gross Domestic Product fell to 92.16 billion 1929 dollars. Prices had fallen 6% and were expected to drop further, raising the real return on cash to 6.4% and the real discount rate to 8.4%, well above the pre-depression real rates of 5-6%[1]. This contractionary monetary policy would continue to depress spending and further the deflationary spiral. The Fed cut rates faster than it ever had before, and managed to outpace deflation until April but the deflationary pressure proved too strong and real rates would continuously increase for the next year.

One would expect that banks as owners of large sums of debt such as mortgages would benefit from the deflation due to its appreciation in real value but one must remember that bank deposits are liabilities owed to customers. Their assets and liabilities would both increase in value due to deflation, but waves of foreclosures would tilt the scale towards default. Seeing these risks and the strings of prior bank runs, depositors rushed to withdraw putting further pressure on banks. In response banks hoarded reserves by ceasing lending in an effort to stave off runs, reducing access to credit and worsening the economic situation. Radical action was needed, radical action that wouldn't come.

[1]: This isn’t quite true as there were not expectations of deflation as there usually aren’t under a gold standard. Realized real rates were high which hurt borrowers, but they wouldn’t know it at the time.



1931​

A nation, whose money decreases, is actually, at that time, weaker and more miserable then another nation, which possesses no more money, but is on the encreasing hand. This will be easily accounted for, if we consider, that the alterations in the quantity of money, either on one side or the other, are not immediately attended with proportionable alterations in the price of commodities. There is always an interval before matters be adjusted to their new situation; and this interval is as pernicious to industry, when gold and silver are diminish-ing, as it is advantageous when these metals are encreasing?...​
It is also evident, that the prices do not so much depend on the absolute quantity of commodities and that of money, which are in a nation, as on that of the commodities, which come or may come to market, and of the money which circulates. If the coin be locked up in chests, it is the same thing with regard to prices, as if it were annihilated.​

- David Hume, "Of Money" page 40 and 42

Throughout the world, “coin [was] locked up in chests” as banks increased reserves and consumers increased their savings in part due to the increased return on cash and in part as a response to risks of unemployment. Although prices had dropped, the flow of money had dropped faster and that difference was the fall in real output, now 90.9 billion 1929 dollars over the year. This constituted a decline of 13.1% and coupled with the 15.2% decline in prices would correspond to the 26.3% [2] total decline in nominal gross domestic product.

Factories increasingly went idle as demands for products such as automobiles dried up. Idle factories led to unemployed workers furthering lowering demand in a vicious cycle. All in all, across 1931, employment declined further with 102.8 billion hours having been worked across the year, a decline of 14.6% since 1929.

January to April would act as a reprieve from the constant drops leading many commentators to call the bottom of the contraction. On January 2nd, the British and French would meet to try halting Britain's gold outflows. The next day, France would cut its discount rate by 50 basis points, both boosting the Dow. For the next couple months, France's gold stocks would stop increasing letting the UK increase theirs. This shift in gold flows to England instead of France was overall stimulatory for the world economy as the UK's gold reserve ratio was lower, increasing the amount of currency in the world despite gold supply remaining fixed.

The Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, henceforth called the Nazi party, was harshly against international cooperation and the payment of reparations. Although they had grown in power since before the depression, they had been successfully locked out of governance and unable to create much risk for international finance.

In May, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York would lower its discount rate one final time to 1.5%. At the same time, Creditanstalt, the largest Austrian commercial bank would experience a run and collapse. Gold fled Europe, despite the low rates in America, as the contagion spread to Germany, where the central bank had its own run and capital controls were imposed in July. As news of Germany's fate spread to the UK, traders expected the Bank of England to follow soon, pounding the pound. Fears over the new German-Austrian customs union and the defeat of the internationalist Briand in the French presidential election prevented much coordination from occurring.

Despite general fear and the destructive catalysts, certain men in britain had been cheering abandonment from the start such as Keynes. He argued that adherence to gold convertibility limited the options policy makers could take to respond to the depression. If the currency floated freely, much more monetary stimulus could occur without gold outflows to worry about. As wages hadn't fully adjusted to the new prices, if prices were to be reflated by increasing aggregate demand, the pre-depression equilibrium could be returned to and the level of employment with it. Under his insistence and the immense pressures imposed by traders, the peg was withdrawn on September 21st and the pound's value immediately fell surprising many [3] by its suddenness.

Across the Atlantic, another crisis was brewing. As investors witnessed what happened across Europe, they became increasingly worried about a similar situation happening in the US. Gold poured out of the US dollar and towards personal stores between June 1927 and 1931, the stock of privately held gold would decline $50 million a year but it would increase by $405 million(4.5% of all the gold in the world's monetary stock) between June 1931 and 1932. To prevent a collapse similar to the one in England, the New York Fed was forced to raise rates 200 basis points to 3.5% in October. This would only put further downwards pressure on the economy but it was deemed necessary to maintain the peg. Despite the interest rate hikes, private gold hoarding would continue to increase, drastically shrinking the monetary base. The Fed was in a truly terrible situation, raising rates to keep gold in the system would hamper credit but keeping them flat would lead to a shrinking money supply. European central banks facing possible central bank collapses would increasingly hold gold further contracting the world economy.

Discount_Rate.png


Although there were initial hopes for international cooperation where many countries would pursue a more expansionary policy to prevent gold flows, hope would gradually dry up with every additional day of intransigence. The death of Germany's internationalist Foreign Minister, Gustav Stresemann, in 1929 and the New York Fed's Benjamin Strong in 1928 would lay the groundwork for the end of international cooperation. Strong had been happy to maintain the price level throughout the 20s and accommodate Britain's overvalued currency, the change in policy would be visible across the great depression as price level rapidly dropped and Britain was left high and dry in late 1929. Increasingly negative sum contractionary policy across the world would act as an additional feedback loop depressing the economy.

The lack of cooperation was so damaging that Irving Fisher would say "gold disarmament is just as difficult of attainment as is military disarmament. No greater problem exists today than a possible gold shortage". FDR's general interest in economics and growing popularity within the Democratic Party would induce Fisher to establish a relationship. On one of Roosevelt's now frequent stops at Columbia, he would introduce himself. He too recommended a shift from a gold standard to a commodity standard based on 1924-1926 prices. Despite his poor reputation from his prediction in late 1929 that stocks had reached a "permanently high plateau", he would be brought on as an advisor on economic policy during FDR's presidential campaign.

As the situation became less tenable in Germany, markets increasingly expected a renegotiation of the Young Plan for debt repayment and the Young Plan bonds dropped in price. Contrary to future linkage between values of the two, the US stock market would rise upon rumors of US officials being sent to Europe where YPB prices dropped.
Over the course of these crises and his correspondence with Keynes, Roosevelt would increasingly become convinced that the US would also have to cast aside its gold peg in order to prevent further deterioration. While pondering monetary policy, he would put his power as governor to good use: the large scale funding of public works. State funding would be granted to the Independent Subway System to further its construction in addition to various dams along the Saint Lawrence river along with the Attica Correctional Facility.

In addition, The Metropolitan Reconstruction Corporation would be formed with an initial transfer of $50 million with which it could borrow up to $500 million for the purposes of redevelopment and employment within New York City. It would plan to receive an additional $20 million per annum in subsequent years. Chaired by Clarence Stein who briefly chaired the New York State Housing and Regional Planning Commission, it would engage in slum clearance and redevelopment around the new Independent stations. Frequently it would pay workers with food, housing, small stipends and the promise of a future home of their own.

Despite the lack of explicit directives demanding segregation, African American workers and displaced renters would mostly be given the promise of housing in The Bronx and northern Manhattan whereas various white ethnic groups present in tenements would be given promises of housing in Brooklyn or the new units on the East Side.
Areas directly surrounding new stations would aim for densities of around 100-300 persons per acre depending on the distance from Manhattan. Units were split into 4 main categories:
  • Worker owned units used as compensation for the construction work. These varied from smaller units in flats which would be owned outright as a condominium to larger buildings such as an entire row-house which required a 10 year mortgage to pay for a portion of it. 40% of units in buildings owned by the MRC would be in this category.
  • Privately owned units either as entire buildings or units in a condominium. These would be sold on the open market subject to regular market pressures.
  • Market rents would be charged for some buildings that had continued government ownership. Around 30% of units in buildings owned by the MRC would fall under this category.
  • Low rent housing would be provided in an experiment to quell the homelessness which had been rising throughout the depression. Typically this would be priced at around half of market rents and would require possible renters to prove that they were of good moral character and were of sufficient need. In practice, this was used to prevent African Americans from making use of the program in predominantly white neighborhoods. This would make up the final 30% of units in MRC owned buildings.
This policy was unpopular with many and classified as government overreach by certain journalists but it would keep tens of thousands of New York construction workers with a steady income and escaped the scrapyard due to the crisis.

Sensing the pressures to unpeg and increasing willingness among politicians like Roosevelt, investors further withdrew gold to not be caught flat footed by a devaluation. The more gold was hoarded, the worse the economy would become further increasing pressures for and expectations of devaluation.

[2]: Percentages are weird. 0.869 * 0.848 = 0.737
[3]: We know that it was unexpected because 3 month forward discounts between the Dollar and the Pound were only 3 cents in August(a rise from the half cent earlier but still small). Similarly, bond prices almost entirely dropped on the 18th and 19th of September: From 104 on the 5 1/2 percent coupon in early September to 100 on September 18th and 92 on the 19th.



1932​

Although industrial production is easier to track and would fall more drastically than real gdp, it wasn't the steepest contraction in an important metric. That honor would go to gross private investment in structures such as homes and factories. From 1929 to 1932, it would fall from 7.8 billion dollars to 1.4 billion dollars. The wave of home building and industrial expansion of the 20s had ended and over a third of the unemployed were ex-builders. In fact, due to depreciation America's stock of capital would decline, scarring its capacity to produce in the future.

Most mortgages at the time were short-term(usually around 5 years), and non-amortized(the principal would not be paid off by normal payments). If you wanted to buy a house, you would take one of these loans and pay 7-12% interest a year, based on your creditworthiness among other things, before being responsible for the entire principle at the end. Normally people would then take out a moderately smaller loan as they refinance because although they wouldn't have saved enough to pay off the entire thing, they would've saved some money in the interim. As the great depression rolled around however, many would become unemployed and not make enough income to even pay off interest.

The other main form of a mortgage consisted of entrance into a building and loan association which were cooperative local organizations with an alternate payment structure. Instead of paying off the loan, debtors would buy shares of the B&L until they had reached the principal. Although such an institution was easier to get into, defaults were more severe as shares were forfeit and the full value of the debt was still owed. Rather than being a simple debt, B&Ls would saddle debtors with large directional bets on the value of the creditor; great when it moves in your favor, terrible if not. For most of the 1920s, B&Ls would appreciate in value but that would all change in late 1929.

As employees were laid off they had less income with which to buy B&L shares and thus defaults rose. Yet, all across the nation, incomes were falling and so too were home values. Rather than foreclosing on the house and selling it to recoup their loss, B&Ls would get pennies on the dollar. Banks faced similar problems and in response further reduced access to credit due to the increased risk. Debtors counting on the ability to take out new mortgages would find themselves defaulting and the situation would further reinforce itself. Such was the essence of the great depression, credit would dry up, causing credit to dry up further in endless cycles of decreasing demand and defaults.

Hoover’s frequent response was to pressure companies into keeping wages high. In November 1929 he asked industrial leaders to keep wages steady and he would continue to make similar demands throughout the Depression. Manufacturers generally listened to him, with nominal wages only falling 12% compared to the 29.6% decline in prices. This was great for those able to keep their jobs and hours but the higher cost of labor would lead to further layoffs with unemployment reaching a high of 28.1% in December 1932.

As June gave way to July in the sweltering Chicago summer, Democrats from across the nation converged on their quadrennial convention. Although Franklin D. Roosevelt had 765 delegates through successful primaries, he fell just shy of the two-thirds(769) required to clinch the nomination on the first ballot.

FDR's bold economic platform resonated most powerfully with western farmers and southerners at large, but he was able to rack up lopsided delegate hauls in reeling mill towns across Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Ohio.

Overnight, Roosevelt's Lieutenants would negotiate with Garner for a vice presidential position and nothing else, which was all that Garner's bargaining power would lend him. On the second ballot, he would be elected with a firm 930 delegates with some minor southern defections. In his acceptance speech he would say:

...Let it be from now on the task of our party to break foolish traditions. We will break foolish traditions and leave it to the republican leadership, far more foolish in that art, to break promises. This convention wants a new deal, your candidate wants a new deal and I am confident that the United States of America wants a new deal. I say to you now, that from this date on, Hoover's recession is doomed. I pledge myself to relief and recovery for the American People. Give me your help not to live votes alone, but to win in this crusade to restore America to its own people. [Music begins playing and Roosevelt walks off].​

As the Democratic convention played out, a parallel drama was unfolding in the nation's capital. Thousands of World War I veterans, their families, and affiliated groups descended on Washington D.C. in late May 1932. Dubbed the "Bonus Army", these protesters sought to pressure Congress to immediately pay out certificates granted to them to compensate for wages lost during the war.

With the Depression raging and many veterans unable to find work, the certificates due in 1945 represented a potential lifeline. Led by organizers like Walter Waters and aided by allies like cannery worker leader "Crazy" Herb Corey, the Bonus Army established a series of ramshackle camps ringing Washington. At its peak, over 50,000 marchers established semi-permanent settlements on the Anacostia Flats.

Though the Bonus Army aimed to be peaceful, clashes with local police grew more common as the brutal D.C. summer dragged on in squalid conditions. On July 28th, two protesters were shot by regulating forces, inflaming tensions further. President Hoover, wary of the growing shantytown and negative optics, called in the U.S. Army to disperse the marchers. Led by Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur, the crackdown saw cavalry troops attack with gas(adamsite not mustard or chlorine gas), bayonets, and tanks as fires were set to the protesters' camps.

The violent military assault against desperate World War I veterans provoked national outrage. Newsreel footage of the crackdown airing in cinemas fueled a backlash against the incumbent Republican administration. Roosevelt would come out in favor of a partial early payment, increasing his support among veterans and perceived risk of currency devaluation.

If the value of assets or incomes relative to debts could be raised, the cycle could be broken but the gold peg meant that expansionary policy could be mostly eaten by private and central bank gold hoarding in response to increased fears of devaluation. The French Central Bank for example would switch out all of their dollar assets for gold over the course of 1932. Although a switch from Dollars to Francs would've been neutral, France's 100% gold reserve ratio policy meant that such actions were contractionary. In 1926 the Bank of France held 7% of monetary gold, but by 1932 it had reached a staggering 29% of world monetary gold, barely edging the Federal Reserve system in the US which had also kept 29% of monetary gold.

As the situation continued to worsen, GDP fell to 56.298 billion dollars in 1932 with 88.8 billion hours worked. The quantity of labor was 26.2% lower than 1929 while nominal GDP had declined 46.2% since its peak. Every missing dollar made it that much harder for debtors to service their debt. Bankruptcies skyrocketed across the nation as mortgages went unpaid for. As assets owned by banks became increasingly worthless, they responded by further hoarding reserves in an effort to stay afloat.
 
Last edited:
Great Depression Recap
The Great Depression proceeds as normal until a December 12th meeting between Keynes and Roosevelt at a Columbia lecture. Roosevelt slowly becomes more convinced of Keynes’ ideas and does a stronger public works program in New York. In late 1931, fears of a British devaluation are slightly stronger and fears of an American devaluation are moderately stronger. The economy is slightly more contracted in 1931 America. In 1932, fears of American currency devaluation further increase gold hoarding and weaken the economy significantly compared to OTL.
TTL's Hours Worked.png
OTL's Hours Worked.png
Nominal GDP Until 1932.png
Inflation until 1932.png
Real GDP until 1932.png
 
I have more written but the election stuff isn't the best atm and I need to write the lame duck session. After that there's chapters on the first hundred days and US monetary policy in 1933 done.
 
Chapter 1.5: Poor Huddled Masses

Chapter 1.5: Poor Huddled Masses​

Pittsburgh, July 1931​

The thin smog hanging over the city stung Jacob Miller's eyes much less than usual as he trudged home from another fruitless day searching for work. At only 26 years old, he felt like an old man already.

Four months earlier, he'd been one of over 20,000 workers at the massive Jones & Laughlin steel mill on the Monongahela River. A husky 6'2", Jacob had reveled in the arduous but well-paying job, operating one of the huge furnaces that fed the endless demand for American steel.

Then the bottom fell out. Orders dried up one by one each month as the economy collapsed. By January, the mill was running at less than 20% capacity. Layoffs came by the thousands every week until Jacob's number finally came up in March. He still remembered the gut-punch of fear as the foreman read his name from the trimmed roster.

Now his once-muscular frame was leaner, his clothes hung loose from missing too many meals. Sweeping periodically to earn a few coins was all the work he could find. His wife Sarah waited tables but her wages weren't enough to cover their $12/month rent, let alone feed themselves and two-year-old Willie.

Jacob turned onto their street in Lawrenceville, the rows of decaying wood homes shadowed by the looming mills. Bringing home a bag of food being given out, he could make out Sarah's slight form waiting on the front stoop, could see the resigned slump of her shoulders even from a distance.

"I'm sorry," she said simply when he reached her. They'd fallen behind again. The landlord said if they couldn't catch up this month, they'd be evicted.

That night, they liquidated what little savings they had left and packed up their meager belongings. In the morning they headed towards the river bottoms and the ramshackle Hooverville there. Somewhere between one of Pittsburgh's last working furnaces and the stinking waters of the Monongahela, American dreams went to die.


Gary, May 1932​


Margaret was a precocious girl at the age of 13 playing stick ball with the local kids or working at her family's grocery store. Her mother was illiterate and kept a tally in her head but work had become much easier lately as purchases kept decreasing.

Her older brother Sam would often drive her in their mothers car, called "the machine" in a thick Yiddish accent, to run errands or deliver orders around the Jewish Quarter. On this muggy spring day, Sam was taking Margaret to the city's south side to pick up a bulk shipment of flour and canned goods for the store's depleted stock.

As they bumped over the potholed streets, Margaret watched the city's grimy landscape pass by the Model T's cracked windows. The once mighty steel mills that drew her Russian immigrant parents here decades ago were operating at a bare fraction of capacity these days. Plumes of black smoke belched from just a few scattered furnaces.
Entire neighborhoods were virtually abandoned, homes boarded up as families lost their livelihoods and relocated or lived doubled-up with relatives. On several blocks, Margaret spotted ragged men camped out under any available shelter - a bridge abutment, a few sheets of scrap metal - part of Gary's growing Hooverville.

Sam was 17 and almost done with high school, more educated than most Americans he should've been old enough to find jobs other than their overstaffed family store. He liked architecture but new construction had long since ceased and no one was hiring.

As they made their way through town, they spotted a demonstration against lynching and a man yelling about communists. Quickly a brawl began forcing Sam to rapidly turn left and leave the area without completing any tasks their mom had set out. With nothing better to do, violence was reaching a crescendo in America.
 
Chapter 2: Vote Roosevelt and Make it Unanimous

Chapter 2: Vote Roosevelt and Make it Unanimous​


FDR emerged from the Democratic Convention in Chicago with a growing momentum. Despite pressure from some to engage in a porch campaign, he would criss-cross the country stopping to speak at the many cities of the US along the way. Unburdened by the south, in terms of both his high support and the lack of compromise needed for it, Roosevelt could focus almost all his efforts on the North. Its status as a Republican stronghold only emboldened him to build an unassailable mandate to rule.

Much of the associated characteristics of the Democrats in the north were sidestepped. Roosevelt was a protestant, fought hard against machine politics in his time as Governor of New York and did not inherit the segregationist policies of his southern comrades.

FDR would embark on a national campaign tour, stopping in over a dozen cities to give speeches to large crowds. His focus was on the industrial cities of the Northeast and Midwest where the Great Depression hit hardest. In Detroit, FDR would speak to an audience of 20,000 at the Olympia Stadium, promising to take action to promote economic recovery. He would make similar stops in Pittsburgh, Cleveland and Chicago - all cities with high unemployment due to factory closures where some such as Detroit would have unemployment rates as high as 37%.

His activist vision of government resonated strongly in these hard hit areas, a fact made clear by the large and enthusiastic crowds that greeted him. FDR pioneered the use of radio and film to spread his message, allowing him to reach into the homes of millions of Americans and build widespread support for his campaign. However, the Republicans managed to outspend them on the radio and even the Socialist Party of America raised enough to purchase an hour of radio time.

The economy continued to deteriorate rapidly in the latter half of 1932. Bank failures would reach an all time high of 2,500 in one year. This widespread economic pain led to growing dissatisfaction with Hoover, who was widely perceived as not doing enough to address the crisis. Increasing numbers of Republican politicians and voters abandoned Hoover and threw their support behind FDR, who they saw as more likely to take decisive action. FDR's positioning of himself as a non-partisan unifying figure made it easier for Republicans to cross party lines to support him. Several prominent former Bull Moose progressives, including Henry Wallace and Harold Ickes would make the migration, finding irony in shifting their loyalty from one Roosevelt to another.

On the eve of the election, an Illinois man had even written to the president, telling Hoover to "Vote Roosevelt to Make it Unanimous". Although American ballot secrecy makes it impossible to verify who individuals voted for, it is unlikely that Hoover heeded his words, though a chance remains.

The 1932 election resulted in a landslide victory for FDR and the Democrats. Roosevelt secured 472 electoral votes to Hoover's 59, capturing 59.8% of the popular vote compared to Hoover's 37.9%. FDR's margin of victory in the popular vote, 21.9 percentage points, was the largest since the largely uncontested election of 1820. It also represented the biggest swing in United States history, from the 17.4% republican margin in 1928. 1/3rd of voters switched their votes, with the rest being made up for with shifts in voting propensity.

1932_Election.png
1932_Election_Swing.png


Riding the president-elect's coattails, house democrats would pick up 125 seats for a new total of 341 to the republican's 89. In a similar rout, the senate was home to 15 newly democrat seats putting the democrats at a firm majority of 62 to the republican's 33. The mandate had been firmly taken by FDR with muscular majorities ready to enact his agenda.

Not since Franklin Pierce in 1852 had a Democratic candidate won the presidency with a popular vote majority. Such overwhelming gains would cement Roosevelt's power over the party and allow for a rapid alteration of American society.
 
Last edited:
Bravo for doing an economics centric TL and tossing some quantification in there too!

People seem to be afraid of or averse to anything but the most superficial economics centric what ifs, at least in the post-1900 forum. [they're a bit more open to it with pre-1900, age of discovery extractive and mercantilist Econ].

And I say all this even with the libertarian lean of several of your sources going against the grain of my more Keynesian priors. It is good to have this stuff get duly covered.
 
Bravo for doing an economics centric TL and tossing some quantification in there too!

People seem to be afraid of or averse to anything but the most superficial economics centric what ifs, at least in the post-1900 forum. [they're a bit more open to it with pre-1900, age of discovery extractive and mercantilist Econ].

And I say all this even with the libertarian lean of several of your sources going against the grain of my more Keynesian priors. It is good to have this stuff get duly covered.
I’m not personally a libertarian, at least in the tax and spending sense but I think Sumner has the most convincing narrative of the Great Depression out there. I want to remain accountable if I’m bringing in political biases from my sources though which is why I listed them.

Roosevelt is going to behave in a more Keynesian way here in response to being friends with Keynes instead of Hoover. This also means that Hoover is skipping out on some stuff like the reconstruction finance corporation or the debt repayment pause and has lower deficits. Roosevelt’s also not attacking Hoover for profligate spending as he did OTL which gives him wider latitude to do some pretty enormous spending with no tax hikes or other spending cuts(such as the halving of Supreme Court pensions which delayed the retirements of the four horsemen).
 
Chapter 3: Of Lame Ducks and Big Brains

Chapter 3: Of Lame Ducks and Big Brains​

By the close of the Hoover administration, virtually the entire banking system was shut down and the U.S. government was losing gold at an unprecedented rate. Yet, the only discernible macroeconomic consequence of this crisis would be a modest dip in industrial production during March 1933.​
- Scott Sumner, The Midas Paradox

To restore the economy to its status in 1929, tens of millions of workers would need to regain their jobs. As wages are sticky, stimulatory monetary policy which increases inflation can lead to real wages falling and lower labor costs would cause increased employment as the marginal hire becomes more profitable. One way of doing this would be to set an explicit target for monetary policy to try to reach, such as a restoration of 1929 prices, a policy well articulated by Republican Senator Phillips Lee Goldsborough:

In anything like normal times, specific directions to the Federal reserve system to use its power to maintain a given price level will tend to decrease very greatly these periods, or stop these periods of expansion and these periods of deflation which so destroy confidence and produce the very mental condition that you are talking about...I do not think in the condition the country is in now we can rely upon the action of the Federal reserve system without the announcement of a policy. A banker may look at his bulletin on Saturday or on Monday morning and see that the Federal Reserve system has during the previous week purchased $25,000,000 worth of Government securities. But that does not restore his confidence under present conditions because he does not know what the board is going to do next week...If this legislation...were passed, the Federal Reserve Board could call in the newspaper reporters and say that Congress has given us legislative directions to raise the price level to a certain point, and to use all our powers to that purpose, and we want you to announce to banks and public men at large that we propose to go into the market with the enormous reserves we now have available under the Glass-Steagall Act and buy $25,000,000 of Governments every day until the price approaches the level of that of 1926...f the bankers and business men knew that was going to be the policy of the Federal reserve system,...it would restore confidence immediately...and the wheels of business would turn.​
They had done it. President-Elect Roosevelt had the door open to whatever policies he wanted to implement. On the campaign trail he had been building up a following of advisers to plan for what they would do once in power. FDR's deliberate vagueness on the campaign trail, outside of promises for government employment similar to New York under his tenure left them with a wide latitude which his advisers were eager to disagree over.

Constituting this "Brain Trust" of men were mostly Columbia professors who Roosevelt had met in his now frequent visits to the University. This group was made up of 5 men:
  • Rexford Tugwell: A liberal from Sinclairville, Tugwell received a PhD in Economics from Columbia where he taught from 1920 to 1932. He was a supporter of government planning with a focus on production curtailment in the agricultural sector. However, he was also a supporter of large scale urban planning and advocated for an expansion of Roosevelt's public housing construction in New York across the country.
  • Harry Hopkins: Hopkins had one of the longer working relationships with the president-elect, serving as the president of his Temporary Emergency Relief Administration upon the recommendation of Jesse Straus, FERA's chairman. He would act as the biggest advocate for mass employment through construction work and the Trust Agreed that he should run any such program.
  • Adolf Berle: A Bostonian by birth, Berle graduated from Harvard Law school at the age of 21 before joining the US military. He would spend his time trying to increase Sugar production through the use of better contracts. Upon his return to the US he became a lawyer and eventually a Columbia professor. Berle had weaker policy beliefs than the rest of the Brain Trust and mostly focused on speech writing and campaign strategy for Roosevelt.
  • Raymond Moley: The most conservative of the bunch, Moley too spent most of his time on speech writing. Despite his ideological breaks with the others, he was the creator of the Brain Trust and responsible for much of the personnel work involved. Despite his misgivings with many of the policies proposed by the Trust, Moley remained a steadfast enemy of fascism and pushed for greater weariness towards Hitler and Mussolini. These beliefs led him to hold back the appointments of various fascist sympathizers who nonetheless supported Roosevelt such as Breckenridge Long [thanks for the idea @Esotariot2002 ] though he was unable to curb Hugh S Johnson from heading certain infrastructure programs.
  • Irving Fisher: Fisher was the oldest Brain Trust member, having been born in 1867 and was also the most well known. He contributed a unique focus on monetary policies and bank regulation which was lacking among the others. The policy which he held on to strongest was the return to the price level of 1924-1926 from the current greatly depressed prices. However he also supported the transformation of banks from lending institutions to simply deposit holding ones, however the idea was mostly shot down.
As they argued while bringing in new faces to head organizations and sought feedback from outside sources such as congressmen, the Brain Trust settled on a general method of recovery:
  1. A return to the prices of the pre 1929 years and a federal reserve mandate to keep them there, necessitating an abandonment of the gold standard. This plan had to be kept secret so as not to spook the markets and cause further gold hoarding to try to avoid the devaluation. Although not quite committing to a gold standard, FDR would make numerous public remarks on the importance of the stability of the US dollar.
  2. Reforms to the financial sector including increased oversight of securities and various policies to improve banking stability. In particular banks would be discouraged from offering mortgages due to the risky nature of land speculation. Deposits would be split between extremely safe assets(like AAA bonds and treasuries) backstopped by the government and explicitly risky accounts. Additionally, banks would be encouraged to merge with others serving unique geographic regions to reduce risk of localized defaults.
  3. A continuation of normal spending and tax policy coupled with a reduction in tariffs. This would be made up for when the recovery was well underway with a shift towards income and corporate taxes. The reintroduction of a national property tax remained controversial but was held in advisement.
  4. Emergency and temporary appropriations for large scale government employment. This too would be phased out as the recovery reached its conclusion. Everyone wanted to avoid pure cash relief due to its supposed deleterious effects on the soul.
  5. Longer term government development work primarily through large scale public works such as electrification or transportation infrastructure construction. This was to be paired with land acquisition and development around the infrastructure to fund the ventures and improve America's urban living standards.
  6. A general increase in investment through changes in the tax code and government funding or even outright purchase of private organizations linked to national security. Top of the list were railroads and munitions production due to the extreme struggles faced by the nation's railways and the nation's opposition to war profiteering.
The last point in particular having been pushed by Eleanore Roosevelt who was in agreement with Tugwell and Hopkins. Too many men had become rich by selling the implements of war while sending other people's kids to die in trenches. The proceeds from munitions should go to the victims of the conflict in her mind.



Hoover paced the oval office frequently these days. His presidency was going down in flames and he was not going to repeat his term. Each day brought another slew of bank failures as depositors lined up for hours outside their doors, hoping to retrieve their life savings before it was too late.

Hoover, ever the believer in the power of private charity and volunteerism, redoubled his efforts to quell the hunger that stalked the land. He implored community organizations and religious groups to step up and provide aid to the growing ranks of the unemployed and destitute. But even these efforts seemed like a drop in the bucket compared to the scale of the crisis.

The American people were not starving on the streets and were even living longer than they had before he took office, but that was little consolation to a man going home penniless for the 3rd year in a row. He had tried his best to spread the pain out, workers could buy more than ever for an hour of work, and he tried to avoid layoffs by spreading the work around, but the problems only compounded around him.

The once-mighty railroads, the backbone of American industry and commerce, were not spared from the economic turmoil. One by one, they fell into receivership, unable to meet their obligations in the face of plummeting revenues and mounting debts. Houses across the nation would similarly be abandoned with shuttered windows, or lived in by squatters as mortgage holders missed their payments and banks could find no buyers.

As he prepared to leave office, Hoover could not help but feel a sense of bitterness and resentment at the way he had been treated by the American people. Despite his best efforts and previous popularity, he had become a reviled figure, a symbol of the nation's misery and despair. In his private moments, he lamented the fickleness of public opinion, wondering how he could be so hated when, by some measures at least, the nation was better off than it had ever been before.

Such reflections brought little comfort as the clock ran out on his presidency. The challenges he was leaving to his successor were immense, and he could only hope that the next occupant of the White House would be able to succeed where he had failed but the man was too enamored with the whispers of his red sycophants and in all likelihood would make things even worse. At least he could finally get some rest in his close to old age. Blessed be the young, for they shall inherit the national debt.
 
Last edited:
Chapter 4 is longer and comes out tomorrow for engagement maximization reasons as I am a vain creature. Thanks to everyone who has been reading and commenting! Please point out any mistakes I make whether grammatical and syntax or just implausible events.
 
Roosevelt is going to behave in a more Keynesian way here in response to being friends with Keynes instead of Hoover.
OK - you're saying in this TL Roosevelt is friends with Keynes and that is a change. But what does the "instead of Hoover" part of the sentence mean? Roosevelt wasn't friends with Hoover, not by the time they were opposing candidates. It's not like anybody faced a mutually exclusive choice of hanging out with Keynes or Hoover. Or are you saying Hoover was friends with in real life with Keynes, and here he is not?

If so, I never heard of that.

This also means that Hoover is skipping out on some stuff like the reconstruction finance corporation or the debt repayment pause and has lower deficits.
So wait, are you saying these were two moves that Hoover made because he was........friends with Keynes.......and he was following a Keynesian playbook with them?

But he did hesitate to apply it in a lot of other policy areas, regarding relief for individuals. He certainly wasn't funding make work programs or Keynesium ad Absurdum like paying some workers to bury bottles of currency and other workers to dig them up. Post-Presidency he didn't cop to any of these ideas and staunchly championed classical economics.
 
OK - you're saying in this TL Roosevelt is friends with Keynes and that is a change. But what does the "instead of Hoover" part of the sentence mean? Roosevelt wasn't friends with Hoover, not by the time they were opposing candidates. It's not like anybody faced a mutually exclusive choice of hanging out with Keynes or Hoover. Or are you saying Hoover was friends with in real life with Keynes, and here he is not?

If so, I never heard of that.


So wait, are you saying these were two moves that Hoover made because he was........friends with Keynes.......and he was following a Keynesian playbook with them?

But he did hesitate to apply it in a lot of other policy areas, regarding relief for individuals. He certainly wasn't funding make work programs or Keynesium ad Absurdum like paying some workers to bury bottles of currency and other workers to dig them up. Post-Presidency he didn't cop to any of these ideas and staunchly championed classical economics.
Hoover was friends with Keynes IRL! Keynes is one of the reasons Hoover decided to go ahead with delaying the debt repayments. The lack of RFC is artistic liberty to portray a more laissez faire Hoover in general.

Fiscal Year(ends June 30th of the year named) 1932 and 1933 had 4 and 4.5% deficits as a proportion of GDP respectively. Notice that outlays as a proportion of gdp increased from 3.4% under Coolidge to 7.9% in Fiscal Year 1933. Hoover was not a hardcore Keynesian by any means, but did quite a bit of new spending. Remember that OTL FDR criticized Hoover for his deficits.
 
Last edited:
To add some commentary to Chapter 3:
Fisher was not part of the Brain Trust OTL. I figure an FDR more open to some of his ideas who is also more active in talking to economists could entice him especially since the depression is worse and FDR is in a stronger political position.

Moley is also using more influence here for foreign policy, this is in part because he is compromising more on economic policy. With no long, there's going to be a bigger reaction to the invasion of Ethiopia and more Jewish refugees.

OTL the new deal suffered greatly from not having an overarching plan. Here they manage to be more focused. Notice the relative lack of attention placed on regulations, this new deal is going to be much more focused on spending and ownership rather than forcing the private sector to reduce hours or burn crops. Tugwell gets distracted by the jingling keys of public housing construction and railroading.

Banking regulation is also planning to be weaker which shouldn't effect things much in the short term. Long term there's going to be shifts in housing ownership patterns (towards more landlords and mobile home parks). There might be an earlier financial crisis similar to 2008 and people are going to fully lose their savings if they aren't held in the federally backed deposits.

The federal property tax is probably not coming back, I don't want to make this a georgism wank despite my name. American income and corporate taxes are going to be significantly better than OTL though. Hint: Fisher is involved.
 
Proceed and do your thing. I want to watch and see how this rolls along, what it does to America and the world and so on.
I'm still not sure if they were just acquaintances or proper friends but Carlos recommended it to me and I thought it was pretty cool.

American foreign policy is not going to change that much but there's two conflicting forces for their performance in WW2 here:
1. America has more money for interwar military funding and more willingness to use it. FDR is in a stronger political position and isolationism holds less sway when people have jobs and there's less to focus on internally. Also debt payments are still happening so America is more willing to help the British.
2. There's much less loose labor that can be put into mobilization. Mobilization is going to go hand in hand with less consumer goods, even if the home front is better than OTL, it's going to be worse in relation to prewar.

My gut is saying that the US will perform a lot better in the war but it's reasonable to claim that nothing much will change or that they'll do slightly worse.
 
I'm still not sure if they were just acquaintances or proper friends but Carlos recommended it to me and I thought it was pretty cool.

American foreign policy is not going to change that much but there's two conflicting forces for their performance in WW2 here:
1. America has more money for interwar military funding and more willingness to use it. FDR is in a stronger political position and isolationism holds less sway when people have jobs and there's less to focus on internally. Also debt payments are still happening so America is more willing to help the British.
2. There's much less loose labor that can be put into mobilization. Mobilization is going to go hand in hand with less consumer goods, even if the home front is better than OTL, it's going to be worse in relation to prewar.

My gut is saying that the US will perform a lot better in the war but it's reasonable to claim that nothing much will change or that they'll do slightly worse.
There's also greater possibility of taking action that deters one or more enemies entirely, or forces fighting with enemies to be asynchronous rather than simultaneous, and thus less expensive. Also, not all international conflicts the US might become involved with in this era under all circumstances *have* to be resolved with adversary unconditional surrender or occupation/American-administered regime change of the enemy homeland.

You can write your own ticket. You're still in 1933 here.
 
There's also greater possibility of taking action that deters one or more enemies entirely, or forces fighting with enemies to be asynchronous rather than simultaneous, and thus less expensive. Also, not all international conflicts the US might become involved with in this era under all circumstances *have* to be resolved with adversary unconditional surrender or occupation/American-administered regime change of the enemy homeland.

You can write your own ticket. You're still in 1933 here.
I forgot to say pre 1939. Lend lease is going to be different due to the war debt situation and FDR's going to be more jumpy than OTL after the 1938 midterms. The main thing is that I want to avoid a Germany crushed when it remilitarizes the Rhineland or something similar as I have some ideas for interesting war mobilization policies that require there to be a very large war as impetus.

I'll keep the option of a conditional surrender in mind, especially with a possible Japanese conflict.
 
Top